Over the summer between second and third year i attended both London Metropolitain and UAL degree shows in order to gain inspiration for how i could present my space at the end of third year. I was hoping that by doing this research i could bring back some fresh ideas to Cardiff Met. The layout in both universities was vastly different to how we present our work at Cardiff Met, especially because not every student would display their work due to the lack of space within both universities. Despite this it was still awlfully informative to see the dirverse nature of textile applications and all the tricks they used to hang 2D and 3D work on the walls.
London Met
London Metropolitain University used a series of grid like structures to hang textiles work from. Although giving the show an overall industrial aesthic it was hard to pinpoint one persons work from another. It was clear to see how some had used a series of designs that formed a collection; however, as not everyone had done there was no concistancy throughout the show making it awlfully confusing.
Despite the shows confusing and sporadic nature it was really informative to see the style and mediums of work that were being produced. It has definely helped me to concider the type of work i want to be producing within theird year and how i would fit into the industry.


UAL
The show at UAL was alot more concistant with what we do at Cardiff Met as there was more evidence of a concidered collection and each designer had their own space marked out. The presentation of work was alot more experimental and informative to what i shall be producing next year.
There was a high volume of students focusing on knitwear who had cleaverly extended their garments to become part of the display as the images below show. Despite the designs being the least aesthically pleasing it was the final image that really caught my imagination as it was so different from all else. The fabric had been attatched to the wall using nails; however, there was something really inspiring about having to tilt your head in a different angle to view the work. It added a whole new dimension to what the design could be applied to and definetly stood out from the rest because of its obscure placement.




Buisness Cards
Both universities also had a series of buisness cards accoumpying each persons work. Knowing i will have to produce a design for this in third year i picked up a few from each university so i could compare the substrates used, printing methods and overall aesthic of the design. I tried to gaver a diverse range of those i thought were sucessful and others that were not so much so i could analyse where i thought they went wrong so i dont make the same mistakes.
London Met


Overall these 4 buisness cards were pretty concistant in the substrates they used. They were all printed onto a high gsm matt card which made them seem more durable and professional compared to if they were printed onto a light weight paper.
I am in two minds about the size of number 4. It is half the size of the others meaning it will proably cost half the price to print which would be of benifit to any student; however, the information on the back was in such a small font it would be very hard for anyone without perfect vision to read.
I think from this research the buisness card needs to be clear, direct and accuratly link to the work that is being displayed. Although i am sure number 2 has some intresting themes behind it the design is not aesthically pleasing from an outsider view. Unfortunatly within the exhibition i coudnt see any work that resembeled this pattern leading me to believe it wasnt very well concidered.
UAL
There was a much more diverse range of standards at UAL. Number 3 had been printed onto ‘normal’ printing paper which made the card flimsy and didnt give it that professional edge.
Number 2 was quite pleasing not because of the imagery used; however, because it had been printed onto a high gloss paper. It gave the impression the designer had really concidered their options, this glossy effect was well selected as it was also reflected in the work they had produced.
Although on a slightly more flimsy substrate number 4 really stood out to me because of the concideration of paper used. It was so different to the thick flat matt cards that most others seemed to have gone for, and for that reason it really stood out. I also really like how the font used suits the paper its self so give off an overall well rounded aesthic. Despite this i do believe the reverse side of the card would benifit from some colour or pattern; however, this may be due to the fact the paper is a much lower gsm and there for coudnt absorb the inks used.


Key take away points:
- Use a large font
- Concider the substrate used and how well it will absorb colour printing
- Use a reasonable sized buisness card so all information can be clear
- Concider weather a matt or gloss effect suits the collection
- Ensure the imagery and font used ties in with the collection
- Use colour to your advantage
- Ensure the imagery is clear and can be understood without any prior knowledge required about the key underlying themes


































